Child Support Agency CSA - Fathers' Rights

Families Need Fathers welcomes Council of Europe interest in UK Family Law

• Council of Europe accepts motion that could lead to full investigation of UK Family Law and Courts.

• Human rights being abused in Britain says John Hemming MP.

The text of the motion is: The Parliamentary Assembly recognises that human rights are part of the Council of Europe's key values. It recognises that systems are needed for the protection of children when they are at risk. The Assembly believes, however, that those who are tasked with protecting children need to be accountable for their actions and need to operate in a way which protects the human rights of those people they are dealing with

The Assembly notes that there is substantial concern that the secrecy of the Family Division of Courts in England and Wales has caused the development of an environment in which practitioners are not properly accountable. It notes that a number of people have emigrated from England because they feel persecuted by the authorities tasked with Child Protection.

The Assembly particularly notes the use of Section 54.4 of the 1999 Access to Justice Act by the Court of Appeal in England which is preventing cases being considered by the Supreme Court in England and the way in which this acts to undermine the rule of law allowing the Family Division of Courts to operate in isolation from the wider body of law.

The Assembly recognises that questions have been raised as to whether the judicial proceedings in England s Family Courts are compliant with Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Right to a Fair Trial).

Jon Davies CEO of Families Need Fathers called this A very interesting development and one that might at last make the British Government act before it is forced to.

- ENDS -

Note for editors: Families Need Fathers (FNF) is a registered charity providing information and support on shared parenting issues arising from family breakdown, and support to divorced and separated parents, irrespective of gender or marital status. Our primary concern is the maintenance of the child's relationship with both parents. Founded in 1974, FNF helps thousands of parents every year.

For comment or information please contact:

Nick Barnard, Director of Communications 07979 206 384

John Baker, FNF Chair 07881 644 917

Jon Davies, FNF CEO 07976 935 986

Becky Sibert, Policy & Information Officer 020 7613 5060

For more information on Shared Parenting please see;

http://www.fnf.org.uk/publications-resources/factsheets-guides

Please see Families Need Fathers 'programme for change' Father's Day Manifesto at

http://www.fnf.org.uk/about-us/fathers-day-manifesto

Nick Barnard

Director of Communications

Families Need Fathers

Raise money for FNF online - click here to find out how.

Family Needs Fathers Press Release

Press Release

For Immediate Release – 6^th February 2008

Not Fit for Purpose –

British Family Justice System fails those it claims to serve

• “Slow, expensive and lacking in continuity”: Families Need Fathers (FNF) reveals severe failings in the British Family Justice System

• Family lives being ruined every day

• FNF calls for dramatic overhaul of the closed family courts system

Research conducted by FNF has confirmed the shocking deficiency of the Family Justice System, whose business is conducted behind closed doors. Family lives are being ruined every day through delay, inconsistency and a system that fails its users. The survey asked respondents of their experiences with the courts: lengths of time involved, the standard of service they received from professionals throughout the process and the amount of judicial continuity experienced. Answers revealed a system which is failing those it exists to serve.

The survey revealed a distinct lack of judicial continuity, with respondents sitting before numerous different Judges throughout the lifetime of their case and often considering the service received from the professionals involved to be substandard. High expense and long delays compound the experience even further.

John Baker, FNF Chair said, “In a process which is by nature distressing and painful, long delays between applications to court and orders being made (up to 5 ½ years from survey results), there will inevitably be many undeserving victims, i.e. the children, whose entire lives will be disrupted whilst a new ‘status quo’ is established. This can have life-long destructive effects on these children.”

“The fact that proceedings of such magnitude can happen without being open to wider scrutiny is completely unacceptable,” he added.

A snapshot of findings from the report of FNF’s research study The Law, the Authorities and You! Experiences of the Family Justice System can be found at the end of this release. The full report is on the FNF website at http://www.fnf.org.uk/publications-resources/research. Alternatively contact the office on 0207 613 5060.

- ENDS -

Note for editors: Families Need Fathers (FNF) is a registered charity providing information and support on shared parenting issues arising from family breakdown, and support to divorced and separated parents, irrespective of gender or marital status. Our primary concern is the maintenance of the child’s relationship with both parents. Founded in 1974, FNF helps thousands of parents every year.

For comment or information please contact:

Nick Barnard, Director of Communications 07979 206 384

John Baker, FNF Chair 07881 644 917

Jon Davies, FNF CEO 07976 935 986

Georgina Brereton, Policy & Information Officer 020 7613 5060

Please see Families Need Fathers ‘programme for change’ Father’s Day Manifesto at

http://www.fnf.org.uk/publications-resources/articles/fathers-day-manifesto

1) Time from court application to 1^st order being made: 35 answers

• The longest length of time given was 2 years
• The shortest length of time given was 1 month
• The average length of time given was 6 months 3 weeks

2) Time from court application to final order being made (for those who have reached that stage): 34 answers

• The longest length of time given was 5 ½ years
• The shortest length of time given was 4 months
• The average length of time given was 1 year 11 months

4) Respondents were asked to grade the standard of the Judges, CAFCASS officers, and lawyers involved throughout their proceedings

§ Experiences of Judges: 60 answers

Ø 30 (50%) respondents said negative

Ø 10 (17%) respondents said positive

Ø 20 (33%) respondents said average

§ Experiences of CAFCASS: 56 answers

Ø 36 (64%) respondents said negative

Ø 7 (13%) respondents said positive

Ø 13 (23%) respondents said average

§ Experiences of lawyers: 44 answers

Ø 29 (66%) respondents said negative

Ø 2 (5%) respondents said positive

Ø 13 (30%) respondents said average